Protect the return on every behind-the-meter deal
Your model only works when the site does. SOLR AI prequalifies the roof, de-risks the grid connection and keeps generation visible across the portfolio, so the assumptions behind each offtake agreement hold from signature to operation.
The problem
Where PPA economics leak
Deals die late and expensively. Surveys are spent on roofs that were never viable. Grid connection uncertainty stretches timelines the model never priced. Design errors surface after signature, and once assets are operating, monitoring is scattered across systems that do not talk to each other.
Surveys spent on dead sites
Site visits are booked before anyone knows whether the roof can carry the kWp the model assumes. The cost lands whether or not the deal survives.
Grid risk priced too late
The connection route, and the time and cost it carries, is discovered after commitment. A delay the model never priced erodes the return across the whole tenor of the agreement.
Operations in fragments
Once assets are generating, availability and performance data sit in a different system per site, and the portfolio view is stitched together by hand.
See it working
The record behind the agreement
Fleet generation
LiveLast 7 days · kWh per day
Last 24 h
611kWh
This week
4.3MWh
Availability
23of 24 h
Illustrative demonstration with fictional data
Before signature
Price the risk in, before commitment
Every deal that dies after the survey, and every connection delay discovered after signature, comes out of the return. SOLR AI moves that discovery to the top of the funnel, where it costs a desktop assessment instead of a write-off.
Prequalify the site before the survey
A desktop assessment from aerial imagery reads roof geometry, orientation, shading and usable area, and returns a viability verdict with indicative yield before anyone travels. Sites that cannot support the deal are screened out at the top of the funnel, not at the bottom of the budget.
Know the grid route early
G98 or G99, and which of the fourteen GB distribution licence areas the site sits in, shapes the timeline and the cost. The connection route is assessed at prequalification and the application prepared to the network operator's requirements, ready to submit, so grid risk is priced in before commitment rather than discovered after it.
Design the model can rely on
System design, yield and the costed proposal are generated consistently on one record. The numbers in the offtake agreement and the numbers in the design are the same numbers.
After handover
The portfolio, monitored
After handover, generation and availability stay on the same record, per asset and across the portfolio, with every stakeholder looking at the same picture.
Monitored against the model it was priced on
The yield and self-consumption assumptions behind each agreement sit on the same record as the generation data, so an underperforming asset is visible when it starts underperforming, not at the next quarterly review.
A signal for O&M, not archaeology
A live view of availability per asset points O&M effort at the sites that need it, without stitching exports together by hand. It is visibility, not settlement: billing and metering stay with the systems that own them.
We provide the data and the modelling. We are not a financial adviser, and nothing here is investment advice.
The platform
Runs on Enerwise Commercial®
Enerwise Commercial is SOLR AI's commercial platform: the shared system of record that energy companies, financiers, installers and property owners all work from, from the first viability check to a generating asset.
Explore Enerwise CommercialFAQ
Questions PPA operators ask
How does prequalification work before we commit to a survey?
A desktop assessment from aerial imagery reads roof geometry, orientation, shading and usable area, then returns a viability verdict with indicative yield. Sites that cannot support the agreement are screened out before anyone travels, so survey budget is spent only on the roofs that can actually carry the deal.
When do we find out about the grid connection route?
At prequalification. The assessment identifies whether the site follows the G98 or G99 route and which of the fourteen GB distribution licence areas it sits in, and the application is prepared to the network operator's requirements, ready to submit. Grid time and cost are visible before commitment, not discovered after signature.
Can we monitor operating assets against the assumptions they were priced on?
Yes. After handover, generation and availability stay on the same record as the yield and self-consumption assumptions behind the agreement, per asset and across the portfolio. Every stakeholder looks at the same picture. It is visibility only: SOLR AI does not handle billing or settlement.
Does it work across a whole portfolio or one site at a time?
Both. Each site is assessed, designed and monitored on one record, and those records roll up to a portfolio view with identical fields per site, so projects are comparable. The same platform runs a single agreement or a pipeline of hundreds, and nothing is re-keyed between stages.
Who makes the decisions, the platform or our team?
Your team. AI agents run the workflow: they assess sites, prepare applications and keep the record current. People make the decisions. Anything that feeds a contractual step, such as a connection application or a costed proposal, is prepared for human review and sign-off before it goes anywhere.
Bring your portfolio, leave with a view on it
A working session, not a pitch. Bring the pipeline and the operating assets: which sites clear prequalification, where the grid risk sits, and what the portfolio looks like on one record.